Sunday 25 November 2012

Week 8 Reflections: More tools and sadness creeping in


Before writing the reflections for this week, I decided to read what Jasmina had written. It brought about a sense of nostalgia before actually experiencing it. She had talked about only two weeks to go before finally all of us go our separate ways which kind of brought about a sense of sadness especially because I had felt an absence of it for the first four days of the week. I did not feel it much till Wednesday since I was busy like everyone else in drafting my project report, but still there was a feeling of something not right. I really felt it hard on Thursday morning and afterwards when there was a sense of ennui. There is a good feeling also that till now one has been able to learn a lot and has been able to apply it to classroom teaching successfully as well. Like Jasmina, I also want the rest of the classmates to be in touch even after we graduate this course.

Project Report

Nostalgia apart, the week was very fruitful for me personally. I did not think that I would be able to draft a report so quickly. It was very easy because of the simple reason that this course has been designed in such an organized manner that one keeps doing the groundwork every week for the final run and it does not seem to much labour towards the end. My parter Nino and I have already shared our first drafts on the class wiki and I am eagerly awaiting for feedback from all quarters. I would request everyone who reads this to please have a look at my project report and suggest changes and corrections no matter how minor they may be.

Peer Assessment as a Part of the Project

One of the fulfilling things this week that worked for me was organizing a peer assessment exercise for my class of Poetry i.e. BA Semester-I on Monday, November 20. It was held in the computer lab at 3:00 p.m. and was a thought out exercise in which each student was to be assessed on his/her post on Practical Criticism of the poem "The Daffodils" by William Wordsworth based on the interactive power point presentation that I had made. 

The task was done in such a way that all the students were assessed by two peers who were assessed by other peers. In this way any scope of benefit to each other was ruled out. To ensure objective assessment, a rubric was also provided to the students. Despite this, I could see that there are marked variations in the assessment done by the students. It was for this reason that it was announced initially that the peer assessment will be reviewd by the teacher.  I have also realized that I am very lenient in my marking scheme.

Tools

Besides the tools discussed this week, I realized that the biggest tool is the internet. As I posted on the Nicenet discussion forum as well that it makes me feel jealous with the present day students because I remember the struggle one had to make in collecting material for my MA classes especially in a paper on Greek Mythology and Drama. The books on the topic were so rare and costly that it was not possible to buy them. If I were doing my MA now, I am sure there would be no problem in getting the material.

The other tools that we were introduced to this week are:

  1. SMILEhttp://clear.msu.edu/teaching/online/mimea/smile/v2/index.php
  2. Hot Potatoeshttp://hotpot.uvic.ca/
  3. Easy Test Makerhttp://www.easytestmaker.com/default.aspx. I was also able to make a very simple test with the help of this tool and post it on our class wiki. 
  4. 4Teachers: A very good educational resource that has a great pool of other resources within it like Rubistar, Quizstar, Academic Skills builder etc.( http://www.4teachers.org/tools/)
  5. Dvolver Movie Makerhttp://www.dvolver.com/moviemaker/index.html
  6. Crossword Puzzle Game: http://www.crosswordpuzzlegames.com/create.html
  7. Web Poster Wizardhttp://poster.4teachers.org/
  8. ANVILL: A National Virtual Language Lab. (https://anvill.uoregon.edu/anvill2/)
  9. Tools for Educatorshttp://www.toolsforeducators.com/
  10. Boggles World ESL: It has a huge amount of resources for teachers including worksheets and lesson plans. (http://bogglesworldesl.com/)
I could not explore any other tools as we have semester end exams at our university, but will certainly do so in due course of time during and after this course.

Looking forward to the final draft of my project and an exciting week 9. 


Thursday 22 November 2012

Peer Assessment Results

PEER ASSESSMENT RESULTS

Dear BA-Sem-1,

The results of the peer-assessment are as follows. You will notice the pattern of marking varied despite providing you with a rubric. However, these marks are not final and are subject to review by the teacher i.e. me. 
Name of the Student
Assessor I
Assessor II
Total
Akhil Vasudevan
Sweta-7
Vijay-7
14/20
Ankita Sundriyal
Sweta-8
Vijay-9
17/20
Ayushi Singh
Ankita Sundriyal-7
Akhil Vasudevan- 8
15/20
Faiiz Hussain
Ankita Sundriyal-7
Akhil Vasudevan- 8.5
15.5/20
Faith T Varghese
Ayushi Singh-7
Faiiz Hussain-8.5
15.5/20
Hakim Omar Nisar
Ayushi Singh-5
Faiiz Hussain-8
13/20
Kartik Kashyap
Faith T Varghese-5
Hakim Omar Nisar-5
10/20
Neha Pande
Faith T Varghese-6
Hakim Omar Nisar-7
13/20
Ram Singh
Kartik Kashyap-8
Neha Pande-6
14/20
Roushan Roy
Kartik Kashyap-8.5
Neha Pande-5
13.5/20
Sana Haider
Ram Singh-9
Roushan Roy-4.5
13.5/20
Sayantan Das
Ram Singh-8.5
Roushan Roy-4.5
13/20
Shramona Roy
Sana Haider-8
Sayantan Das-9
17/20
Shubhadarshini Mallick
Sana Haider-5
Sayantan Das-7
12/20
Shyam
Shramona Roy-7
Shubhadarshini Mallick-7.5
15.5/20
Swastika
Shramona Roy-8
Shubhadarshini Mallick-7.5
15.5/20
Sweta
Shyam-7
Swastika-7
14/20
Vijay
Shyam-8
Swastika-8
16/20

Sunday 18 November 2012

Reflections: Week 7- Student Autonomy and 1 Computer Classroom

Despite personal problems at home (father's epilepsy and brain ceasure), and Nicenet down, Week 7 was another great learning experience. It dealt with two topics:

1. Student Autonomy
2. One Computer classroom.

We had to read the whole material and comment on either one of the topics but our course instructor Courtney modified the plan that we had to combine the two for writing our observations. It was a very good plan. Most of us were able work the combination of the two.

How do I normally use Computers in the Classroom?

Before doing this course I used computer in the classroom for normally two things.

1. Conducting a class using the Power Point.
2. Screening a film. 

Rarely when I used to get very creative, I used to create an activity that would include:

Listening Comprehension:

In this activity I would take up a song or a dialogue or a scene from a good movie and ask the students to answer questions based on that; Or I would also ask them to transcribe the lyrics of the song played. 

Assessment during a group discussion or an Interview and giving feedback:

Since I type faster than I write with the help of a pen and paper, when I conducted a group discussion or a one on one interview/ assessment to gauge the level of learning. I used to type the mistakes and errors made in pronunciation, grammar and fluency against the name of every student. I also mailed it to the students.

Recording the voice of the students:

Sometimes when students cannot understand the production of a particular sound, I used the laptop as a recording device. I use it to tell the students, how the word actually sounds and how do they pronounce it. Thanks to Courtney, now I know of a software which is very effective--Vocaroo. 

Jasmina and I during our course of discussion agreed on some of the following points:
  1. Miming: is a very good tool for learner autonomy. The learners can mime their favourite actors or cartoon characters in order to learn a new language. They would lose self-consciousness or hitch while doing so. 
  2. Using songs: The students can make use of songs for improving their listening comprehension. They would listen to a song in English, try to guess the lyrics and then see the lyrics for a while. They would continue doing so until they got all of it right. 
  3. Reading a story: The students write the summary of a story that is read in the class and go home and ponder over it. 

How can I now use Computers in the Classroom?

1. Allowing them free access to all my presentations: This point has been suggested by Jasmina and I agree with it fully. I can also do the same with my students.

2. Allotting workspaces for all courses: In the computer, that could be kept in the class, I could make separate folders for each semester and put the necessary material in that. The credit for this learning also goes to Jasmina.

3. As an Information and Communication station: The computer in the class can be loaded with encyclopaedia or other language learning software which the students can use in spare time.

4. As a Presentation Tool: Besides using it for Power Point Presentation, I can also use it to display my notes or a quiz that I develop or a couple of video clips to drive a point home.

5. As a Publishing Tool: Thanks to Donna Ashmus for giving this idea that a computer can be used for taking out monthly class magazine, newsletter, anthologies, class-room journal, Ongoing story centre and web publishing.

6. As Learning centre and Simulation Centre: Donna gave this idea that drills etc. can be conducted with the help of a specific software. Specialized software can also be used to create simulation, form teams of students.

I am glad that this course has widened the horizon to me for using a single computer in a classroom.



Reading Assignments

1. Dimitrios Thanasoulas's Article

One of the first articles that I read was "What is Learner Autonomy and How Can It Be Fostered?" By Dimitrios Thanasoulas. He quotes Benson and Voller who define autonomy in five ways:

  1. There are situations in which learners study entirely on their own.
  2. Self directed learning in which learners learn and apply a set of skills.
  3. Inborn capacity which is suppressed by institutional education.
  4. Exercise of learners' responsibility for their own learning
  5. For the right of learners to determine the direction of their own learning. 
He also makes a point that learning is simply not a matter of memorization but a constructive process which involves seeking or sometimes constructing meaning. He also believes that the teacher lending a helping hand to students every now and then is a weakness or the sign of an ill-prepared teacher. From these statements, it implies that the author wants the students to be totally self-reliant. However, I have my own reservations. Student autonomy can never be a substitute for the teacher. The author also mentions some cognitive strategies like repetition, resourcing, translation, note taking, deduction, contextualization, transfer, inferencing and question for clarification. Dimitrios also mentions some metacognitive strategies like directed attention, selective attention, self reinforcement and self evaluation. 

According to him self-reports, diaries and evaluation sheets can be used to promote learner autonomy. 

2. Samuel Sheu's Article: Learner Autonomy: Bird in-the-hand or Bird-in-the-Bush?

This is a very interesting article and touched the heart of most of us including Mahesh and me. We discussed the situation in India where the parents and the government decides the future of the students. We came to the conclusion that the autonomy of the learners depends to a great extent on the autonomy provided to the teachers. The situation here in India where the syllabi are now made by the bureaucrats in the government and the schedule is so tight that there is no room for innovation is quite similar to what Sheu mentions in his article. I really liked the statement of the author where he writes, "an examination-dominated system has made every learner of English gasp for breath". Reading the posts of my colleagues made me aware that the situation is more or less in most of the parts of the world and we as teacher need to take steps to promote learner autonomy. 

3. ESL Activities for the One Computer Classroom (S.Gaer): Word-Processing Ideas:


4. Internet ideas:      


5. Donna Ashmus's article:7 Categories of Classroom Computer Use:   I have already used the information of this article in writing how will I now use computer in the classroom. 


                      THE PROJECT

I have chosen Nino to be my partner for the project. 

During the implementation of the technological change in the classroom, I did a lot of things like teaching with the help of web, power point, audio-visual devices, challenging the students to write their own draft on the computer in the computer lab while I observed them. 

To see the effect of this change, I conducted a test in which the students had to use the "Interactive Power Point" that was created by me as a part of the course. They had to use the Power Point Presentation and then write a paragraph on their understanding of the poem. This was also a part of their internal assessment. So this was made formal to bring some seriousness in the task. 

The power point presentation that I used was mailed to the students. They were made to sit in the computer lab for 40 minutes and use the interactive power point. 

Then they were given the task to write a paragraph on the same. 

The assessment would be carried out at two levels.

1. Peer assessment.
2. Assessment by the teacher. 

In order to ensure that the assessment is not subjective or biased, I created a rubric for the students. 

The Rubric that I created to enable the students for Peer Assessment. 

Analysis of A Work of Art : Rubric for Evaluation of an answer on Appreciation of a Poem


CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
Theme of the poem
Makes a complete and detailed description of the theme of the poem and all the important points are dealt with.
Makes a detailed description of the themes of the poem and some of the important points are dealt with.
Makes a detailed description of some of the themes of the poem and one or two important points are dealt with
Descriptions are neither detailed nor complete.
Expression
Excellent, showing personal as well as objective and metaphorical understanding of the poem. 
Good expression showing personal or objective understanding of the poem. 
Fair expression showing some understanding of the poem. 
Neither personal nor objective understanding of the poem is seen. 
Figures of Speech
All the major figures of speech like metaphor, simile, synecdoche, metonymy, personification, hyperbole, transferred epithet etc. are identified.
Most of the major figures of speech are identified.
Only some of the figures of speech are identified.
One or less figures of speech are identified.
Comprehension
The write up shows an excellent comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a good comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a fair comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a very poor comprehension of the poem. 
Language
Excellent, with no grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Good with one or two grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Fair with 3-5 grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Poor with more than 5 grammatical or spelling mistakes.


After the students have awarded points for each category, they need to add them up and divide them by 2. The number that they get will be the marks that they award to their classmate.

Then I appointed two examiners for each student and made sure that they were mutually exclusive so that there was no conflict of interest. 

On Tuesday at 3:00 PM, they will have the assessment in the lab. 

Looking forward to a whole new week. 

Saturday 17 November 2012

Peer Assessment of BA-1: Introduction to Poetry


Dear BA-I Students,

I was glad to read the answers that you have posted in response to the ppt. on Daffodils. However, for the purpose of assessment, we would be adopting a different tool for this test. 

The assessment would be at 2 levels.

1. Peer Assessment: In this you will assess the answers of your colleagues and award them marks out of 10. 

2. Assessment by the Teacher: The teacher will assess the answers after the peer assessment. 

In order to ensure that there is no conflict of interest, I will assign 2 students the task of assessing one student and that is why you have to award marks out of ten. 

To further ensure that the assessment is not very subjective but has some criteria to follow, I have given you a rubrics to follow

Analysis of A Work of Art : Rubric for Evaluation of an answer on Appreciation of a Poem

CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
Theme of the poem
Makes a complete and detailed description of the theme of the poem and all the important points are dealt with.
Makes a detailed description of the themes of the poem and some of the important points are dealt with.
Makes a detailed description of some of the themes of the poem and one or two important points are dealt with
Descriptions are neither detailed nor complete.
Expression
Excellent, showing personal as well as objective and metaphorical understanding of the poem. 
Good expression showing personal or objective understanding of the poem. 
Fair expression showing some understanding of the poem. 
Neither personal nor objective understanding of the poem is seen. 
Figures of Speech
All the major figures of speech like metaphor, simile, synecdoche, metonymy, personification, hyperbole, transferred epithet etc. are identified.
Most of the major figures of speech are identified.
Only some of the figures of speech are identified.
One or less figures of speech are identified.
Comprehension
The write up shows an excellent comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a good comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a fair comprehension of the poem. 
The write up shows a very poor comprehension of the poem. 
Language
Excellent, with no grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Good with one or two grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Fair with 3-5 grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Poor with more than 5 grammatical or spelling mistakes.


After you have awarded points for each category, add them up and divide them by 2. The number that you get will be the marks that you award to your classmate.

I hope this makes it clear, otherwise, feel free to revert to me for any clarification. 

Now, I am appointing the examiners for each of you. The list is as follows:



Name of the Student

Assessor I
Assessor II
Akhil Vasudevan

Sweta

Vijay
Ankita Sundriyal

Sweta

Vijay
Ayushi Singh

Ankita Sundriyal

Akhil Vasudevan

Faiiz Hussain

Ankita Sundriyal

Akhil Vasudevan

Faith T Varghese

Ayushi Singh
Faiiz Hussain

Hakim Omar Nisar

Ayushi Singh
Faiiz Hussain

Kartik Kashyap

Faith T Varghese

Hakim Omar Nisar

Neha Pande

Faith T Varghese

Hakim Omar Nisar

Ram Singh

Kartik Kashyap

Neha Pande

Roushan Roy

Kartik Kashyap

Neha Pande

Sana Haider

Ram Singh

Roushan Roy

Sayantan Das

Ram Singh

Roushan Roy

Shramona Roy

Sana Haider

Sayantan Das

Shubhadarshini Mallick

Sana Haider

Sayantan Das

Shyam

Shramona Roy

Shubhadarshini Mallick

Swastika
Shramona Roy

Shubhadarshini Mallick

Sweta

Shyam

Swastika
Vijay
Shyam

Swastika

Now, following the rubric, the examiners will assess the student and will mail the marks to me in order to maintain confidentiality because I do not want any bad blood. 

The task will be done together on 20/11/2012 in the computer lab at 3:00 PM. 

Hoping to see you all on Tuesday.

All the best for your semester end examination. 

Ashish Pande